Two weeks ago Will and I saw the "Diaghilev and the Golden Age of the Ballets Russes" exhibition at the Victoria and Albert Museum. Unlike the regular museum, these special exhibits do cost money, but the ones at the V&A are especially wonderful and worth the cost. A few days prior we had seen the "Book of the Dead" exhibit at the British Museum. Don't get my wrong--it was a very interesting exhibit, with a lot of information. And I really do love studying ancient Egypt. But it just felt so...museum-y. Not engaging. Like a continuation of the fabulous Egyptian collection they have upstairs. It didn't really seem worth the money.
Poster from 1909 production.
I didn't know much about the Ballet Russes--only what I had learned in history of design. For instance, it was started at the beginning of the 20th century. Stravinsky's input--Firebird and the Rite of Spring, was something I had remembered. I also knew of Paul Poiret and his "Orientalism" and the influence of the dress and costume of the group and the time period. But in the exhibit I learned so much more. About Diaghilev, about his tumultuous relationship with Nijinsky (both his lover and star), and about the other designers and collaborators involved.
The famous, talented, tragic Nijinsky
Diaghilev in 1924
Oh yeah...did you know Picasso did scenic and costume design? Because I didn't until I saw this exhibit. And some of his stuff was quite out there. Think giant cubist cardboard robot soldier costumes...
Oh and Coco Chanel made an appearance as a designer too...
But what I really appreciated was the way the V&A staff integrated all aspects of the production company into the exhibit. They had areas that focused, in depth, on the costume. On scenic design. On Diaghilev's personal history. A room about choreography, video interviews playing on the music and how it was so influential. Projections of different productions of Rite of Spring and Firebird. It also went in chronological order--telling the story so artfully.
I also learned more about Leon Bakst--particularly his costume design. I absolutely fell in love with his rendering style, and have certainly seen it before. Yes, some of the design became more and more abstract over time--with Bakst, and with Ballet Russes as a whole--but even with the pieces I didn't particularly love, I appreciated them all the same.
Bakst's costumes for Daphnis and Chloe
The famous rendering of Columbine. Sleeping Beauty, 1921.
A rendering that became the amazing drop.
The Scale. No, that's not me in the pic. Found it on the internet.
Can you imagine what a production meeting must have been like in a room full of these men and women? So much talent in one room. Yes, the collaborators came and went, yes, there must have been a lot of debate. A lot of arguments. But what they created was something incredible. I though I wasn't a fan of dance. I wrote off the design, to a degree, because it wasn't personally my favorite. But now that's changed. And I have a new appreciation for the Ballet Russes after seeing this exhibit. I am humbled.
Anyway, if you have a chance to see this exhibit, I say that it is a must. For those of you who don't, there is a fantastic publication on the Ballet Russes.
To all of you, Happy New Year (about 8 hours later, that is). I wish you all good health and the best of luck with all your endeavors. Next post: finally a review of Priscilla. One word: Sparkles.
xoxo,
Antonia